look at this VO tank these guys are selling
look at this VO tank these guys are selling
07-26-2010, 01:55 PM
#1
http://www.snapgreentech.com/
This post was last modified: 07-26-2010, 02:23 PM by JB3.
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
pretty neat, looks like it has some really nice features over the usual stuff. Thinking of buying one.
http://www.snapgreentech.com/
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
07-27-2010, 05:34 AM
#2
ForcedInduction
07-27-2010, 05:34 AM
#2
Don't waste money on VO crap. Put the money towards a good, and legal, biodiesel processor.
07-27-2010, 06:37 AM
#3
(07-27-2010, 05:34 AM)ForcedInduction Don't waste money on VO crap. Put the money towards a good, and legal, biodiesel processor.
You and I will never agree on the VO thing obviously
As a point to its illegality, yes, the EPA has a statement to that effect, but only illegal because its not been EPA certified as they state, and they are actually inviting certification, which we were discussing on the other thread. Its a foggy illegality, vs the BLATANT illegality the EPA places on removing emissions devices such as the EGR, which how many of us have done? If we are going to focus on the quasi-illegality of VO based on the EPA, it seems a double standard to then ignore CLEAR illegality on other subjects the EPA has ruled on, like emissions devices.
If this site was populated by stuffed shirts who would never dream of modifying their car, then the question of current illegality would be a more valid point, but as it stands, in the pursuit of experimentation, I would bet that almost every one of us had played with or removed an EPA required device. In that case, I will continually point to emissions evidence on VO vehicles which show that the technology is completely in line with EPA goals, and the only reason legality is in question is one of certification.
In other words, you can't say im in the wrong for taking the hubcaps if we've both already stolen the tires.
Brewing biodiesel is a PITA for me, VO is easier. Tried that for a bit.
Regarding this tank, personally, it looks like a fairly decent product, whatever the technology its made for, I did not see, but I have asked if its usable with 100% biodiesel. I am very interested in the secure strapping, and the DOT build requirements they say they meet. Also the fuel sump and baffles.
Personally, I have had major issues with the concept of secure mounting and proper baffling and sumps most of these companies seem to think fuel tanks do not need. This is the first one I have found where a lot of this stuff is addressed.
This post was last modified: 07-27-2010, 10:19 AM by JB3.
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
(07-27-2010, 05:34 AM)ForcedInduction Don't waste money on VO crap. Put the money towards a good, and legal, biodiesel processor.
You and I will never agree on the VO thing obviously
As a point to its illegality, yes, the EPA has a statement to that effect, but only illegal because its not been EPA certified as they state, and they are actually inviting certification, which we were discussing on the other thread. Its a foggy illegality, vs the BLATANT illegality the EPA places on removing emissions devices such as the EGR, which how many of us have done? If we are going to focus on the quasi-illegality of VO based on the EPA, it seems a double standard to then ignore CLEAR illegality on other subjects the EPA has ruled on, like emissions devices.
If this site was populated by stuffed shirts who would never dream of modifying their car, then the question of current illegality would be a more valid point, but as it stands, in the pursuit of experimentation, I would bet that almost every one of us had played with or removed an EPA required device. In that case, I will continually point to emissions evidence on VO vehicles which show that the technology is completely in line with EPA goals, and the only reason legality is in question is one of certification.
In other words, you can't say im in the wrong for taking the hubcaps if we've both already stolen the tires.
Brewing biodiesel is a PITA for me, VO is easier. Tried that for a bit.
Regarding this tank, personally, it looks like a fairly decent product, whatever the technology its made for, I did not see, but I have asked if its usable with 100% biodiesel. I am very interested in the secure strapping, and the DOT build requirements they say they meet. Also the fuel sump and baffles.
Personally, I have had major issues with the concept of secure mounting and proper baffling and sumps most of these companies seem to think fuel tanks do not need. This is the first one I have found where a lot of this stuff is addressed.
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
07-28-2010, 03:54 PM
#4
(07-26-2010, 01:55 PM)dropnosky pretty neat, looks like it has some really nice features over the usual stuff. Thinking of buying one.
http://www.snapgreentech.com/
I have to say, that is probably theeee best tank setup up I've seen. The only issue is how it fits in the car. Price seems to be good.
.
Gota love Mercedes Diesels!
.
DeliveryValve
07-28-2010, 03:54 PM #4(07-26-2010, 01:55 PM)dropnosky pretty neat, looks like it has some really nice features over the usual stuff. Thinking of buying one.
http://www.snapgreentech.com/
I have to say, that is probably theeee best tank setup up I've seen. The only issue is how it fits in the car. Price seems to be good.
.
Gota love Mercedes Diesels!
.
07-30-2010, 05:25 PM
#5
It fits in the car great, and the mounting system is super easy, two bolts, and its out, 4 bolts and the straps are out, and then you just have the two support rails in there. I was concerned about spare tire access, but there is no problem there.
This tab bracket things are cool, they pop in and out of the side of the tank and lock into place.
Now to build the rest of the system. For now, i may just plumb this up as an aux diesel tank until I put together the cash for more parts
This post was last modified: 07-30-2010, 05:29 PM by JB3.
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
well, I ordered one on monday, and it arrive today! This tank is really nice, I have to admit. It looks very very cool in the car.
It fits in the car great, and the mounting system is super easy, two bolts, and its out, 4 bolts and the straps are out, and then you just have the two support rails in there. I was concerned about spare tire access, but there is no problem there.
This tab bracket things are cool, they pop in and out of the side of the tank and lock into place.
Now to build the rest of the system. For now, i may just plumb this up as an aux diesel tank until I put together the cash for more parts
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
09-11-2010, 01:16 PM
#7
The other smaller option was 12? you would have to go to the site and check it out
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
Its 18 gallons I think. on the 240, give or take 500 miles of range.
The other smaller option was 12? you would have to go to the site and check it out
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
10-02-2010, 12:38 AM
#9
Would it eventually turn the trunk into a diesel/biodiesel/wvo swimming pool? Spilling while filling?
1990 Power Ram 50 V6 SOHC 24V 6g72
I can be wrong, don't take everything I say as verbatim, please fact-check first.
My posts are my personal opinions and thoughts, unless otherwise noted.
I agree, that tank looks nice as a diesel range extender! How well is it sealed though?
Would it eventually turn the trunk into a diesel/biodiesel/wvo swimming pool? Spilling while filling?
1990 Power Ram 50 V6 SOHC 24V 6g72
I can be wrong, don't take everything I say as verbatim, please fact-check first.
My posts are my personal opinions and thoughts, unless otherwise noted.
10-02-2010, 09:19 AM
#10
(10-02-2010, 12:38 AM)300D50 I agree, that tank looks nice as a diesel range extender! How well is it sealed though?
Would it eventually turn the trunk into a diesel/biodiesel/wvo swimming pool? Spilling while filling?
I don't think so, the top plate has a thick O-ring gasket/groove seal, and both caps appear to be pretty well sealed. Plus, they told me it has a roll over vent, so it should not leak even if the tank were upside down. I think it all has to do with the federal safety ratings and such.
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
(10-02-2010, 12:38 AM)300D50 I agree, that tank looks nice as a diesel range extender! How well is it sealed though?
Would it eventually turn the trunk into a diesel/biodiesel/wvo swimming pool? Spilling while filling?
I don't think so, the top plate has a thick O-ring gasket/groove seal, and both caps appear to be pretty well sealed. Plus, they told me it has a roll over vent, so it should not leak even if the tank were upside down. I think it all has to do with the federal safety ratings and such.
1974 240D 617 turbo swap, W201 5-speed, in the works project
1983 240D 616 stock, DD
1989 Chevy Astro, 617 turbo swap, T5 5-speed, 4.56 diff, work van
Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)