STD Tuning Engine OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application

OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application

OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
jav1
GT2256V

119
05-15-2020, 08:52 AM #21
No - I didn't take it as snarky at all... I didn't know the "roll eyes"  thing either so ignorance is bliss?

On the table thing -  that helps because in the table I referenced -  "fuel request table"-,  which is the main one I've played with to tune my fueling,  I have values from 50-90 in my top values row which corresponds to- 100% throttle position.  I'm still not 100% understanding the relationships between "ALL" the tables and it doesn't help that being rather new,  I struggle to find certain things as referenced  because the names used don't always match up perfectly nor are they all under the same "tab"  in the software. 

For example-  I can't find a "rack position request table" under the tables tab... BUT- I do find a "simple rack position request f (fuelrequest)" under the rack control paramters tab... which I surmise is the table you are referring to but,  not knowing all the tabs inside and out- I second guess things when the names used don't match up with the software names 100%? 

In my pea brain from what I gleaned from Baldur- the "simple rack position request f (fuelrequest)" parameter defines how the fuel injection rack moves in response to fuel request values (0-100%).  That parameter should have a max value of 2100 according to Baldur, as that 2100 number represents (approximately) the "full- bottomed out" rack travel value on most stock 606 pumps. But now- if that parameter establishes the relationship between rack command value and fuel request values, I don't understand why the parameter has correlations from  0.0 -  250 when my maximum fuel request value is 100???  In my tune- I set  "simple rack position request f..." values at 260,740,920,1390,2100,2100,2100,2100.  with the first 2100 value represented at 100 and all values above 100-250 still having the 2100 rack command value. Is that right?  I think so but I'm not 100%??? Does this parameter suggest we could have fuel request value up to 250 in the fuel request table??   I'm sure Baldur has a good reason for doing this but not knowing what he knows, it causes me to question if I really understand how to fully use all of the controllers capabilities or if I'm doing it right?
This post was last modified: 05-15-2020, 09:04 AM by jav1.
jav1
05-15-2020, 08:52 AM #21

No - I didn't take it as snarky at all... I didn't know the "roll eyes"  thing either so ignorance is bliss?

On the table thing -  that helps because in the table I referenced -  "fuel request table"-,  which is the main one I've played with to tune my fueling,  I have values from 50-90 in my top values row which corresponds to- 100% throttle position.  I'm still not 100% understanding the relationships between "ALL" the tables and it doesn't help that being rather new,  I struggle to find certain things as referenced  because the names used don't always match up perfectly nor are they all under the same "tab"  in the software. 

For example-  I can't find a "rack position request table" under the tables tab... BUT- I do find a "simple rack position request f (fuelrequest)" under the rack control paramters tab... which I surmise is the table you are referring to but,  not knowing all the tabs inside and out- I second guess things when the names used don't match up with the software names 100%? 

In my pea brain from what I gleaned from Baldur- the "simple rack position request f (fuelrequest)" parameter defines how the fuel injection rack moves in response to fuel request values (0-100%).  That parameter should have a max value of 2100 according to Baldur, as that 2100 number represents (approximately) the "full- bottomed out" rack travel value on most stock 606 pumps. But now- if that parameter establishes the relationship between rack command value and fuel request values, I don't understand why the parameter has correlations from  0.0 -  250 when my maximum fuel request value is 100???  In my tune- I set  "simple rack position request f..." values at 260,740,920,1390,2100,2100,2100,2100.  with the first 2100 value represented at 100 and all values above 100-250 still having the 2100 rack command value. Is that right?  I think so but I'm not 100%??? Does this parameter suggest we could have fuel request value up to 250 in the fuel request table??   I'm sure Baldur has a good reason for doing this but not knowing what he knows, it causes me to question if I really understand how to fully use all of the controllers capabilities or if I'm doing it right?

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Messages In This Thread
OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 04-30-2020, 11:20 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by wiseman89 - 04-30-2020, 11:46 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 04-30-2020, 12:08 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by vica153 - 10-09-2020, 05:39 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by 50harleyrider - 04-30-2020, 06:54 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-01-2020, 06:58 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-01-2020, 08:34 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by 50harleyrider - 05-06-2020, 10:46 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by Motohead1 - 05-06-2020, 07:51 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-07-2020, 09:39 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-12-2020, 08:40 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-13-2020, 08:10 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-13-2020, 09:45 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by barrote - 05-13-2020, 01:15 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-13-2020, 10:43 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-13-2020, 12:21 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-14-2020, 08:01 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-14-2020, 10:21 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-15-2020, 07:33 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-15-2020, 08:11 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by 50harleyrider - 05-15-2020, 06:23 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-15-2020, 09:11 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-15-2020, 08:52 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-15-2020, 10:25 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by baldur - 05-17-2020, 08:29 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by jav1 - 05-15-2020, 10:41 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by 50harleyrider - 05-17-2020, 06:23 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-19-2020, 06:40 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by 50harleyrider - 05-19-2020, 01:29 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by zeeman - 05-19-2020, 05:44 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 05-21-2020, 08:57 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by X Double Dot - 10-09-2020, 09:00 AM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by AlanMcR - 10-09-2020, 12:49 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by TE27Levin - 10-09-2020, 02:06 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by vica153 - 10-09-2020, 04:29 PM
RE: OM606 Turbo Selection for Truck application - by 50harleyrider - 10-11-2020, 09:04 PM
Users browsing this thread:
 2 Guest(s)
Users browsing this thread:
 2 Guest(s)