Prechamber Mod "Flame" Front
Prechamber Mod "Flame" Front
(01-30-2011, 04:41 PM)DeliveryValve(01-23-2011, 11:11 AM)ForcedInduction(01-22-2011, 05:52 PM)DeliveryValve ...
Quote:My understanding is the stock Prechambers are just fine for higher HP output and any modification would hinder and not improve performance.They are, you're correct.
....
[(01-29-2011, 09:11 AM)ForcedInduction [quote='yankneck696' pid='23822' dateline='1296308579']Also, Hercules stated that on an otherwise stock engine, that chamfering the holes on the outside benefitted.A bell-mouth form will improve flow efficiency into any tube, its simply not cost-effective for a manufacturer to do that on a large scale production. Increasing flow efficiency is a good thing, increasing flow volume isn't (in this case).
...
Holy Shi-at. Am I reading that FI is moving from the hardline stance and states a certain modification of a pre-chamber will be a benefit!?
(01-30-2011, 04:41 PM)DeliveryValve(01-23-2011, 11:11 AM)ForcedInduction(01-22-2011, 05:52 PM)DeliveryValve ...
Quote:My understanding is the stock Prechambers are just fine for higher HP output and any modification would hinder and not improve performance.They are, you're correct.
....
[(01-29-2011, 09:11 AM)ForcedInduction [quote='yankneck696' pid='23822' dateline='1296308579']Also, Hercules stated that on an otherwise stock engine, that chamfering the holes on the outside benefitted.A bell-mouth form will improve flow efficiency into any tube, its simply not cost-effective for a manufacturer to do that on a large scale production. Increasing flow efficiency is a good thing, increasing flow volume isn't (in this case).
...
Holy Shi-at. Am I reading that FI is moving from the hardline stance and states a certain modification of a pre-chamber will be a benefit!?